C₂CCU IntelligenceCARBON CAPTURE & UTILIZATION
Independent perspective · Evidence first

Technology atlas / Catalytic hydrogenation

CO₂ methanation

The Sabatier reaction combines CO₂ with hydrogen over a nickel or ruthenium catalyst to make synthetic methane.

Technical reference · Updated 2026-10-10 · No current-news claim

CO₂ + 4 H₂ → CH₄ + 2 H₂O (Sabatier, strongly exothermic)

Where the carbon goes

Carbon returns to the atmosphere when the fuel is combusted, typically within months to a few years of production.

Conceptual process flow · left to right

  1. 01CO₂ + H₂ feed
  2. 02Methanation reactor
  3. 03Heat recovery
  4. 04Water removal
  5. 05Gas upgrading
  6. 06Grid injection

From chemistry to process

Feedstocks
CO₂ or biogas CO₂, Hydrogen
Products
Synthetic methane, Water, Process heat
Catalysts
Nickel-based catalysts; ruthenium for some applications
Conditions
Catalytic route typically operates at a few hundred °C with active heat removal; biological methanation operates near ambient temperature with methanogenic archaea.

Performance & demonstrated scale

Power-to-gas plants have been built at various scales; operating hours and measured output must be verified per site.

2.743 t CO₂/t CH₄ theoretical
Ideal net reaction. Complete conversion; excludes slip, purge and losses.

0.503 t H₂/t CH₄ theoretical
Ideal net reaction. Not actual plant consumption.

Pathway TRL: not assigned. Project-specific evidence is required.

Economics

Hydrogen supply dominates. Roughly half the hydrogen ends up as water, so energy efficiency from electricity to methane is lower than for some other e-fuels.

Climate considerations

Methane slip along the chain can erode benefits; electricity carbon intensity and CO₂ origin determine the result.

CCU Reality Check · pathway assessment

What remains to be demonstrated?

This initial assessment separates process knowledge from the evidence needed for a commercial conclusion. Missing information is left unresolved.

DimensionAssessment and evidence gap
CO₂ feedstock availabilityNo site-specific supplier, volume, purity guarantee or delivery contract has been verified.
Capture and delivered costNot quantified. Capture, conditioning, compression and transport need separate boundaries.
Energy and hydrogen demandTheoretical stoichiometric or thermodynamic values are shown above. Actual process energy and feed losses remain scenario assumptions.
Catalyst and reactor performanceNickel-based catalysts; ruthenium for some applications. No plant lifetime or sustained performance is verified here.
Product separationThe process flow identifies separation stages where relevant; a quantified separation duty and cost remain unavailable.
CAPEX and OPEXNo plant-specific capital estimate or complete operating-cost dataset is attached.
Minimum selling priceNot calculated. Capital recovery, utilization, financing and a complete operating boundary are required.
Fossil benchmark competitivenessNo verified regional benchmark comparison. Calculator benchmark values, where shown, are illustrative.
Climate performanceMethane slip along the chain can erode benefits; electricity carbon intensity and CO₂ origin determine the result.
Scale-up bottlenecksHydrogen cost and electrolyser utilisation; Heat management of the exothermic reaction; Catalyst sensitivity to sulphur and other impurities; Competes with low-cost natural gas.
Customer and offtake readinessNo qualified-customer or executed-offtake evidence is attached to this pathway profile.
Policy dependenceNot assessed for a specific project or jurisdiction. Do not assume subsidies or certification eligibility.

Source references

Original diagrams and explanatory text. References support process context; no numerical commercial performance has been extrapolated.