[
  {
    "id": "heat",
    "title": "Heat resistance & HDT",
    "why": "PLA in particular softens near its glass transition unless crystallised, which limits use in warm environments and durable parts. Stereocomplex PLA and nucleation are the main levers.",
    "measured": "Heat deflection temperature (HDT) and Vicat softening under a stated load; DSC for Tg, Tm and crystallinity; DMA.",
    "evidence": "HDT or Vicat with load and specimen state (annealed or not), measured on the same grade as the claim, ideally next to the incumbent.",
    "refs": [
      "nagarajan2016",
      "tsuji2005",
      "saeidlou2012"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pla",
      "pha"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "toughness",
    "title": "Brittleness, impact & ageing",
    "why": "Several bio-based polyesters are stiff but brittle, and blending or copolymerisation trades stiffness for toughness. Physical ageing can change properties over time.",
    "measured": "Notched impact (Izod or Charpy), elongation at break, tensile tests before and after conditioning.",
    "evidence": "Impact and elongation with notch type and conditioning; results after ageing, not only as-moulded.",
    "refs": [
      "jiang2006",
      "noda2004",
      "nagarajan2016",
      "imre2013"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pla",
      "pha",
      "natural-polymers"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "moisture",
    "title": "Moisture & hydrolytic stability",
    "why": "Ester bonds hydrolyse and amide groups absorb water; both change properties in humid service and during processing.",
    "measured": "Water uptake, property retention after humidity or hot-water ageing, molar-mass loss.",
    "evidence": "Retention of a named property after a stated humidity/temperature exposure and duration.",
    "refs": [
      "laycock2017",
      "winnacker2016",
      "lim2008"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pla",
      "pha",
      "polyamides",
      "natural-polymers"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "processing",
    "title": "Processing window & crystallisation speed",
    "why": "Thermal and hydrolytic degradation in the melt and slow crystallisation lengthen cycle times and narrow the window between melting and degradation.",
    "measured": "Melt flow before and after processing, molar mass, crystallisation half-time, cycle time.",
    "evidence": "Processing on industrial-type equipment with drying conditions, residence time and cycle time reported.",
    "refs": [
      "lim2008",
      "saeidlou2012",
      "noda2004"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pla",
      "pha",
      "pef"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "barrier",
    "title": "Barrier properties",
    "why": "Gas and water-vapour barrier decide packaging use. PEF's barrier advantage over PET comes from suppressed furan ring motion.",
    "measured": "Oxygen, CO₂ and water-vapour transmission rates at stated temperature, humidity and thickness.",
    "evidence": "Permeability with test conditions and thickness, compared with the incumbent measured the same way.",
    "refs": [
      "burgess2014",
      "auras2004"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pef",
      "pla"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "durability",
    "title": "Durability in long-life products",
    "why": "Durable products need property retention over years; inherently dynamic or hydrolysable chemistries must show long-term stability.",
    "measured": "Accelerated ageing (heat, humidity, UV) with property retention; creep.",
    "evidence": "Retention data over stated ageing protocols; real-time data where available.",
    "refs": [
      "nagarajan2016",
      "fortman2018",
      "laycock2017"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pla",
      "thermosets",
      "polyurethanes"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "feedstock",
    "title": "Feedstock availability, land use & variability",
    "why": "The Commission notes that unsustainably harvested feedstocks can drive deforestation, biodiversity loss or land-use competition with food crops. Waste and residue feedstocks vary in composition.",
    "measured": "Feedstock type and origin, certification, batch-to-batch variability.",
    "evidence": "Named feedstock and origin; certification scheme; variability data for waste-based feedstocks.",
    "refs": [
      "bugnicourt2014",
      "isikgor2015"
    ],
    "sources": [
      "com2022-682"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pha",
      "pla",
      "scope-review",
      "polyamides"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "scale",
    "title": "Scale-up, capacity vs real output",
    "why": "Announced or nameplate capacity is not output. Plants can be delayed, run below capacity or close.",
    "measured": "Demonstrated stage (lab, pilot, demo, industrial); capacity status (announced, under construction, commissioned, operating, actual output).",
    "evidence": "Capacity with its status and facility; operating evidence such as commissioning dates or reported production.",
    "refs": [],
    "routes": [
      "pla",
      "pha",
      "pef",
      "bio-polyesters"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "cost",
    "title": "Cost per kg resin and per finished part",
    "why": "A price per kg says little without date, volume, grade and basis (selling price, production cost or target); part cost also depends on processing.",
    "measured": "Price or cost with currency, date, region, volume, grade and basis.",
    "evidence": "A cost figure with all of its basis fields; otherwise recorded as ND (not disclosed).",
    "refs": [],
    "routes": [
      "pla",
      "pha",
      "pef"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "lca",
    "title": "Comparable climate footprint",
    "why": "Footprints are only comparable with the same functional unit, system boundary, data year, energy mix and allocation. Eerhart et al., for example, report PEF versus PET for a cradle-to-grave system.",
    "measured": "ISO 14040/14044 LCA; ISO 14067 carbon footprint.",
    "evidence": "Value with functional unit, boundary, geography, data year, comparator, allocation, biogenic-carbon treatment and review type. No reduction is computed across different boundaries.",
    "refs": [
      "eerhart2012",
      "walker2020",
      "spierling2018",
      "lambert2017"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pef",
      "pla",
      "pha",
      "scope-review"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "claims",
    "title": "Bio-based content & claim accounting (C14 vs mass balance)",
    "why": "Measured bio-based carbon (radiocarbon) and mass-balance attribution answer different questions. The Commission states that mass-balance accounting is not considered suitable for confirming the actual share of bio-based content, and that radiocarbon methods should be preferred.",
    "measured": "EN 16640 / ASTM D6866 / ISO 16620 (measured content); ISO 22095 and schemes such as ISCC PLUS (chain of custody).",
    "evidence": "Whether a claim is measured or attributed, the method, and the share.",
    "refs": [],
    "sources": [
      "com2022-682#mass-balance",
      "com2022-682#radiocarbon"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "scope-review",
      "polyurethanes",
      "bio-polyesters",
      "polycarbonates"
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "eol",
    "title": "End of life & recyclability streams",
    "why": "Biodegradability depends on the environment; industrial compostability does not imply home compostability; compostable plastics in recycling streams contaminate them.",
    "measured": "EN 13432, ISO 17088, ASTM D6400 (industrial composting); environment-specific biodegradation tests.",
    "evidence": "Which environment and standard; certification; recycling route (mechanical, chemical) with demonstrated scale.",
    "refs": [
      "haider2019",
      "mckeown2020"
    ],
    "sources": [
      "ppwr#home-vs-industrial",
      "com2022-682#home-compost"
    ],
    "routes": [
      "pla",
      "pha",
      "bio-polyesters",
      "thermosets"
    ]
  }
]